![]() I shoot in this sort of challenging light all the time, and handling images like this in Lr is trivially easy. This is the best PN could do (and don't anyone even think of suggesting I need to learn to use PN. I'm obviously not clever enough to see into the future so that I can temper my opinion of a piece of software now with the knowledge of what it will be like at version 4.īut - "picture saying more than 1000 words" and all that - here's my main problem with PN: Make excuses for its failings if you like, but they're still failings. I pushed the sliders for hours on that image in LR and i did not get the same level of details (at the same noise level) i get instantly with photo ninja.Īnd if we were discussing Lr v1.0 I'd have made similar comments about Lightroom too.īut we're not: we were asked to express an opinion about Photo Ninja. Im using LR for some time (3 years i think) but if there isn´t something i missed, then i can´t get the same detail rendering in LR. yes the workflow needs some work.īut the image quality is already better then lightrooms in MANY cases. I wanted to like it (I much prefer converters that are just converters) but PN fails on a number of very important points for me. Suffice to say, I've maxed out the (only!) 15 day trial period, and Picturecode isn't getting my money. it would be more or less acceptable at around half the price.it's far too expensive for such an incomplete, inadequately-tested, buggy, limited, flawed software release or.I've tested PN heavily since its release, and my overall impression (given the bugs I've found, the irritating, inefficient and downright faffy workflow/UI decisions it embodies, the lack of flexibility in its functionality and - crucially - the regular and predictable false-colour artifacts it produces in highlight recovery, which aren't fully corrected by the colour correction tool) can be articulated in one of two ways. I would also like to hear what you think about it. I can only advice anyone to test this RAW converter and build your own opinion!! I can´t say it better with my bad english.Īt least for my canon cameras i find the photoninja colors more pleasing, without any tweaking Sorry i hope you all understand what i want to say. It comes from sharpening i guess but Photoninja does not show it, or much less. One thing that bothers me with LR since forever are these strange artifacts you can see in your example image too, this "pixelation" around contrasty edges. With Photoninja i get the same clean image, or cleaner, but with more details. I think that is not so much.īut you can see that you lose some details in foliage etc. In LR i normaly use around 15-30 luminance noise for images under ISO 800. Im not sure if it´s because the Noise Reduction of Photoninja is better. What looks smeared in LR often shows details in Photoninja. I managed to quench out more details then with Lightroom.Īnd im not a Lightroom newbie, thought im a Photoninja newbie. But the rendering of small details is great. Yes i have tested it for a few days and i think it IS impressiv. but look how much detail photoninja managed to show).īest i could achive with LR and with photoninja. Here is a crop from an image (from the image backround, not in focus. I sure will spend some more time testing photoninja. The photoninja color is SPOT ON without any editing. No matter what LR profile i use the color is off by default (too purble or too light blue). The photos i have looked at show a blue yamaha R1 bike on a racetrack. I have only looked at a dozend of photos yet but color rendition seems to be great out of the box. The colors are way better out of the box. They don´t affect the medium tones as much as LR.įor the images i tried it on i liked it better then lightroom. I noticed that the highlight and shadow adjustments in photoninja work more restricted. Loaded some DNG files and compared it to LR. Mark van Dam Wedding photographer, Wasaga Beach, Ontario ![]() ![]() “The image quality this program produces absolutely destroys any other raw converter I've tried in terms of colour reproduction, exposure controls, and noise reduction. Pete Myers Fine art photographer, Santa Fe, NM. “Photo Ninja makes small format camera images look like medium format work - simply fantastic!” Tomas Hellström Photography enthusiast, Sweden Better than any other raw converter I have ever used. “I have been using Photo Ninja for a while now and I must confess that the image quality is amazing. How does LR and PhotoNinja compare in image quality?īut how much is just PR blahblah ( makes small format camera images look like medium format).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |